:: Boxes ::
- Box 1. Colombia’s popular movement for reform
- Box 2. The Kenyan process [2010] and the Bougainville process [2004]
- Box 3. Damaging deadlines
- Box 4. “Revolutionary legality” and “necessity”
- Box 5. South Africa: The certification judgments
- Box 6. Negotiating interim arrangements in Nepal
- Box 7. “Incremental” change in Chile
- Box 8. Options for “starting over” in Kenya
- Box 9. Who should participate—and how? (Sometimes known as “actor mapping”)
- Box 10. Veil of ignorance
- Box 11. Civic education in Rwanda prior to the referendum [2003]
- Box 12. South Africa [1996]: Preparing the public to participate
- Box 13. Examples of official websites of constitution-making bodies
- Box 14. Evaluations of civic education workshops: Some observations
- Box 15. Examples of legal mandates to conduct public consultations
- Box 16. Uganda: The use of views
- Box 17. Nepal 2009: Problems that arise when a process is poorly planned
- Box 18. Use of the Internet in Kosovo [2008]
- Box 19. Pitfalls to avoid when using volunteer questionnaires: The case of Iraq [2005]
- Box 20. How South Africa’s two million submissions were counted
- Box 21. Use of views in Papua New Guinea [1975]
- Box 22. Use of social media to prepare a constitution: The case of Iceland [ongoing process]
- Box 23. Example of a strategic planning process
- Box 24. Benefits of a diverse staff
- Box 25. Examples of secondments: Timor-Leste [2002]
- Box 26. Translating the language of constitutions
- Box 27. Establishment of a donor group: Afghanistan [2004]
- Box 28. Who makes the rules?
- Box 29. What is a simple majority? A debate in the Timor-Leste constituent assembly [2002]
- Box 30. Challenges to participation of women in decision-making bodies
- Box 31. Parliament as the source of incoherence in the Fiji constitution
- Box 32. Development of the text in some modern constitutions
- Box 33. Bringing the constitution into effect in Eritrea [1997]: A mistake
- Box 34. Adopting, promulgating, and publishing the Kenyan constitution [2010]
- Box 35. Commissions or committees?
- Box 36. The nondeliberative constitution-making role of parliament
- Box 37. South Africa: One body, two roles
- Box 38. Members’ active participation
- Box 39. Questions to think about when establishing a commission or committee
- Box 40. Nepal [ongoing process]: A poorly planned management structure
- Box 41. An election for a constituent assembly
- Box 42. Oranges and bananas: Kenya [2005]
- Box 43. Ministers of constitutional affairs
- Box 44. Use of South Africa’s petitions [1996]
- Box 45. Abolition of the death penalty in South Africa
- Box 46. Civil society monitoring in Zimbabwe